Box 32

In 1990, McNerney became a member of the National Advisory Council for the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (AHCPR). This was the same time the Agency was beginning to develop clinical practice guidelines. The guidelines were based on objective data and peer reviewed. They were controversial because many physicians felt they limited their clinical autonomy and others felt they hurt them economically. The Advisory Council material and the Agency material are filed together.

In 1990, McNerney became a member of the National Advisory Council for the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (AHCPR). This was the same time the Agency was beginning to develop clinical practice guidelines. The guidelines were based on objective data and peer reviewed. They were controversial because many physicians felt they limited their clinical autonomy and others felt they hurt them economically. The Advisory Council material and the Agency material are filed together.

In 1990, McNerney became a member of the National Advisory Council for the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (AHCPR). This was the same time the Agency was beginning to develop clinical practice guidelines. The guidelines were based on objective data and peer reviewed. They were controversial because many physicians felt they limited their clinical autonomy and others felt they hurt them economically. The Advisory Council material and the Agency material are filed together.

In 1990, McNerney became a member of the National Advisory Council for the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (AHCPR). This was the same time the Agency was beginning to develop clinical practice guidelines. The guidelines were based on objective data and peer reviewed. They were controversial because many physicians felt they limited their clinical autonomy and others felt they hurt them economically. The Advisory Council material and the Agency material are filed together.